Positive and negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on families of young children in rural Colombia and implications for child outcome research.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the lives of children and families worldwide. The objective of this study is to examine exposures and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on preschool-aged children and caregivers in the Atlántico region of Colombia. METHODS: The COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS) questionnaire was administered in Fall 2021 to 63 caregivers of children in Sabanalarga, Colombia enrolled in a neurodevelopment study as healthy controls. The CEFIS assesses pandemic-related exposures/events and impact; higher scores indicate greater exposure and negative impact. Descriptive and correlation analyses among exposure and impact scores were conducted. RESULTS: Caregivers reported a mean (standard deviation[SD]) of 11.1 (3.2) among 25 COVID-19-related exposures/events; most common types included stay-at-home orders, school closures, disruptions to living conditions and income loss. Total number of events was correlated with higher caregiver (P < .001) and child distress (P = .002). However, the mean (SD) impact score of 2.0 (0.6) suggests a trend toward more positive impact than negative. Caregivers reported improvements to sleep, exercise and family interactions. Some caregivers (n = 21) qualitatively reported negative effects including unemployment, fear/anxiety and inability to visit family, and positive effects such as unification, family closeness and spending more time with children. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of comprehensively exploring positive and negative impacts of COVID-19 and families' subsequent resilience and transformation. Using tools like the CEFIS, those seeking to mitigate negative impacts can contextualize data to better understand study outcomes and tailor services, resources and policy to families' unique needs. CEFIS data likely depend on timing, economic/public health resources and cultural values; future work should prioritize understanding the generalizability of CEFIS findings across samples.

Telemedicine in sickle cell disease: Patient, parent, and provider perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) need frequent health maintenance visits and may face barriers accessing care. Telemedicine, during COVID pandemic, has provided a unique model of care to improve access; however, potential barriers and satisfaction with its use in SCD have not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine caregiver, patient, and healthcare provider (HCP) perspectives and satisfaction with telemedicine in healthcare delivery. METHODS: We surveyed patients with SCD, caregivers, and HCP, who participated in at least one telemedicine visit from March 2020 to June 2021, using the Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). We also accessed and compared the Press Ganey surveys completed by families who completed a telemedicine or in-person visit. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. The internal reliability of TUQ was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Press Ganey data comparing satisfaction with telemedicine versus in-person visits were analyzed by Mann-Whiney U test. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients/caregivers and 10 HCP completed the survey. Patients/caregivers rated satisfaction "excellent" in the five areas (Usefulness, Ease of use, Effectiveness, Reliability and Satisfaction). HCP rated Usefulness, Ease of use, Effectiveness, Satisfaction as "good," and Reliability as "excellent." Press Ganey scores for satisfaction with care for telemedicine and in-person visits were not statistically different (p > .05). DISCUSSION: We found high satisfaction for caregivers and patients as well as HCP in the delivery of clinical services via telemedicine for SCD. We suggest that telemedicine is a viable option for this population and may help overcome the barriers SCD families often face accessing care.

Neurodevelopment in infants with antenatal or early neonatal exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal and neonatal viral exposure may put the developing brain at risk for abnormal neurodevelopment. A clinical program at Children's National Hospital provides detailed follow-up of infants with in utero or neonatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure. AIMS: To determine impact of early SARS-CoV-2 exposure on neurodevelopment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective observational study of infant evaluations between 3/2020 and 11/2021. Demographics, pregnancy and birth details, SARS-CoV-2 data, specialty consultations, and NICU records were extracted from infants' medical records. Infants had neurologic exams and developmental screening with Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Correlations between SARS-CoV-2 exposure type and neurodevelopmental outcomes were analyzed. SUBJECTS: Thirty-four infants evaluated in the SARS-CoV-2 follow-up program. OUTCOME MEASURES: Abnormal neurologic exams or ASQ scores near or below suggested cut-offs. RESULTS: Infants received up to three evaluations. Most (28/34; 82 %) were exposed in utero - 16 to symptomatic mothers (IU-S) and 12 to asymptomatic mothers (IU-A). Six were exposed only as a neonate. IU-S had abnormal neurologic exams at mean (SD) age 112 (24) days and ASQ scores near or below cut-offs for all domains more frequently than IU-A or neonatally exposed infants. IU-S were more likely to score below any ASQ cutoff compared to IU-A (P = .04); differences were significant for Fine Motor (P = .01) and Personal-Social (P = .02) domains. CONCLUSIONS: Early SARS-CoV-2 exposure may impact neurodevelopment, especially among infants exposed in utero to symptomatic gestational parents. Vaccination and other precautions to reduce early-in-life infection may protect against neurodevelopmental delays. Children with early SARS-CoV-2 exposure should have additional longitudinal screening for neurodevelopmental delays.

Transcriptomic analysis reveals optimal cytokine combinations for SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell therapy products.

Adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been used to restore immunity against multiple viral targets in immunocompromised patients after bone-marrow transplantation and has been proposed as a strategy for preventing coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in this population. Ideally, expanded severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-virus-specific T cells (CSTs) should demonstrate marked cell expansion, T cell specificity, and CD8+ T cell skewing prior to adoptive transfer. However, current methodologies using IL-4 + IL-7 result in suboptimal specificity, especially in CD8+ cells. Using a microexpansion platform, we screened various cytokine cocktails (IL-4 + IL-7, IL-15, IL-15 + IL-4, IL-15 + IL-6, and IL-15 + IL-7) for the most favorable culture conditions. IL-15 + IL-7 optimally balanced T cell expansion, polyfunctionality, and CD8+ T cell skewing of a final therapeutic T cell product. Additionally, the transcriptomes of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells cultured with IL-15 + IL-7 displayed the strongest induction of antiviral type I interferon (IFN) response genes. Subsequently, microexpansion results were successfully translated to a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-applicable format where IL-15 + IL-7 outperformed IL-4 + IL-7 in specificity and expansion, especially in the desirable CD8+ T cell compartment. These results demonstrate the functional implications of IL-15-, IL-4-, and IL-7-containing cocktails for therapeutic T cell expansion, which could have broad implication for cellular therapy, and pioneer the use of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to guide viral-specific T cell (VST) product manufacturing.

SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cell Responses Are Stronger in Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Compared to Children With Uncomplicated SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Background: Despite similar rates of infection, adults and children have markedly different morbidity and mortality related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Compared to adults, children have infrequent severe manifestations of acute infection but are uniquely at risk for the rare and often severe Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) following infection. We hypothesized that these differences in presentation are related to differences in the magnitude and/or antigen specificity of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell (CST) responses between adults and children. We therefore set out to measure the CST response in convalescent adults versus children with and without MIS-C following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: CSTs were expanded from blood collected from convalescent children and adults post SARS-CoV-2 infection and evaluated by intracellular flow cytometry, surface markers, and cytokine production following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2-specific peptides. Presence of serum/plasma antibody to spike and nucleocapsid was measured using the luciferase immunoprecipitation systems (LIPS) assay. Findings: Twenty-six of 27 MIS-C patients, 7 of 8 non-MIS-C convalescent children, and 13 of 14 adults were seropositive for spike and nucleocapsid antibody. CST responses in MIS-C patients were significantly higher than children with uncomplicated SARS-CoV-2 infection, but weaker than CST responses in convalescent adults. Interpretation: Age-related differences in the magnitude of CST responses suggest differing post-infectious immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in children compared to adults post uncomplicated infection. Children with MIS-C have CST responses that are stronger than children with uncomplicated SARS-CoV-2 infection and weaker than convalescent adults, despite near uniform seropositivity.